Hinduism and Christianity – Compare and Contrast Discussion Guide

My goal is to make group discussion guides for each of the religions represented in the Contradict logo.  They will be posted for free download on the Contradict Movement homepage.  The first symbol is the symbol OM which represents Hinduism.  For this blog post I have embedded the video I made for an overview of Hinduism and I have provided links for a Leader’s Guide and Participant’s Guide for a group discussion comparing and contrasting Hinduism and Christianity.  Below those links I have posted questions from the guides.  Please watch the video, read the questions and give share your answers in the comment section of this post.

Leader’s Guide for Hinduism/Christianity – Compare and Contrast
Participant’s Guide for Hinduism/Christianity – Compare and Contrast

Group Discussion

1.       1. Do you know anyone who is Hindu?  Have you ever spoken to them about their faith?

2.       2. What do you know about Hinduism? 

3.       3. How does the Bible compare to the Vedas?

4.       4. Brahman is the divine essence that is at the heart of all things in the universe.  This teaching ultimately says that there is only one divine reality and that we are all united in it, in fact we consist of it.  Read Acts 17:28.  What is the relationship that Paul gives between us and God in this verse?  Is it similar to the Hindu belief concerning Brahman?  How is it different?

5.       5. The Hindu teaching of Maya explains that what we perceive to be true is just illusionary. Can you think of any teachings within the Bible that echoes this teaching?  How does Christianity’s view of reality reject the concept of Maya?

6.       6. The illusion of Maya in the world keeps us from seeing the oneness of all things according to Hindu teachings.  To overcome the illusion of individualism and self-centeredness, Hindus practice various spiritual paths called yogas to help them recognize their union with Brahman (the divine essence of all things).  In Christianity, what causes separation between us and God and how is that separation overcome? 

 

7.       7. Central to Hinduism is the belief in Samsara (reincarnation).  The position in society we have in this life was dictated by our previous life.  How we live this life will dictate the direction of our rebirth in the next.  Karma directs Samsara.  Karma has become a term that is used often in Western culture, but it is disconnected from its Hindu origins.  In the West, Karma has grown to simply mean getting what a person deserves in this life.  Is there a concept similar to Karma within the Bible?

8.       8.Does the Bible directly reject the teaching of reincarnation and multiple lives for one individual?  Why can we trust that this is our only life?

9.     9. During the course of this comparison of Hinduism and Christianity what has stood out to you the most?  What did you find most helpful?  What could you use from this discussion when talking with a Hindu to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ?

10. From what we have discussed so far, how have you seen Hinduism and Hindu related philosophies influence our culture?

Did Jesus Die on the Cross?

I met a student at Saddleback Community College yesterday who asked, “How can we be sure that Jesus died?”  I shared the following information with her, but I didn’t have the quotes at the time.  I gave her the website address http://www.contradictmovement.org and told her that there were links to a blog and Facebook and that I would post this for her.  I pray that she finds this and that others who need this information will find it too.  The important part is not just that he died, but that he was buried, and then raised!

Did Jesus die on a cross?

The Gospel accounts record that darkness fell over all the land for a three hour time span as Jesus hung on the cross.  (Matthew 27:45, Mark 15:33, and Luke 23:44,45)  This darkness covering the land is confirmed by the words of Thallus, a Samaratin historian who wrote about twenty years after Jesus’ death, as well as by the Greek historian Phlegon.  Their accounts of the darkness are preserved by the 2nd and 3rd century historian, Julius Africanus, who records both Thallus and Phlegon to confirm the same year and time of the darkness as the Gospels.  Julius records that Thallus tried to explain the darkness as an eclipse of the sun, yet Julius doesn’t buy this argument because:

The Jews celebrate their Passover on the 14th day according to the moon, and the death of our Savior falls on the day before the Passover. But an eclipse of the sun can only take place when the moon comes under the sun, how then could an eclipse have occurred when the moon is directly opposite the sun?1

Concerning Phlegon’s account, Julius records, “It is evident that he did not know of any such events in previous years.”2 This darkness is even recorded in Chinese history:

Summer, fourth month, on the day of Ren Wu, the imperial edict reads, “Yen and Yang have mistakenly switched, and the sun and moon were eclipsed.  The sins of all the people are now on one man.  [The emperor] proclaims pardon to all under heaven.3

The time of this eclipse recorded during the Han Dynasty is placed at 31 A.D., and if the darkening of the sun occurred from noon to three P.M. in Jerusalem that would correspond to be from five to eight P.M. at the current capital of China at the time, Luo Yang, explaining why the Chinese records claim not just a darkening of the sun, but also the moon!4

darkness

                With such internal and external evidence connecting an unprecedented and unexplainable extinguishing of the sun to the time of Jesus’ crucifixion, coupled with accounts of subsequent bodily resurrection; it’s likely that such news reached even the ears of the Roman emperor, who could have sent an investigator who would have had the authority to access all pertinent parties to verify if Jesus was in fact crucified.  Many other investigators of lesser political or wealthy status could have made inquiries about his death.  It wasn’t as if Pontius Pilate was completely inaccessible.  The Jewish Sanhedrin clearly had no problem bringing Jesus before Pilate and Herod to be tried for insurrection.  (Luke 23:1-25) Without a doubt, many Jews and Romans in the region would have wanted to investigate Jesus’ death and would have had the means of verifying if Jesus did die by crucifixion under Pontius Pilate.  Even if they couldn’t speak with Pilate in person, there were plenty of witnesses who saw him sentenced to death, since a riotous crowd shouting for Jesus to be crucified forced Pilate to condemn Jesus to the cross.  (Matthew 27:15-24, Mark 15:9-15, Luke 23:20-25)  Surely, an eyewitness from this scene could be found rather easily in the months to years following Jesus’ sentence. 

Both Matthew and Mark record that after Jesus’ death sentence, that he was taken to the Praetorium, the governor’s residence, where the entire company of soldiers stationed there stripped him, put a scarlet robe on him, gave him a crown of thorns, mocked him, spit on him, beat him, and had him flogged!  (Matthew 27:27-31 and Mark 15:16-20)  After this treatment, the Gospels record that the soldiers led Jesus away to his crucifixion.  Many of these men would be able to serve as witnesses to Jesus’ death, or if they didn’t see execution through until the end, they would be able to point you to centurion and his soldiers who oversaw his final hours. 

simon of cyreneAnother witness that could likely be found was a man from Cyrene, named Simon.  The Synoptic Gospels record that the soldiers forced him to carry Jesus’ cross.  Mark records that this man was the father of Alexander and Rufus.  (Mark 15:21)  He writes these names as if his audience would have known who they were.  Surely, a man named Simon, from Cyrene, who has two sons named Alexander and Rufus, could have been found and interrogated in the early first century.  He should be able to answer the following questions with ease: Were you forced to carry a cross at the time of the Passover?  Was the man whose cross you carried, Jesus of Nazareth?  Did he say anything to you?  What was his condition like when you carried his cross?  Was he crucified at Golgotha, The Place of the Skull, as Jesus’ disciples claim?  Is it true that a sign was placed over his head that said, “THIS IS JESUS, THE KING OF THE JEWS.”?  Did you see Jesus nailed to the cross?  What about his death?  Did you stay to witness it?  Could you tell if any of his followers or family was there for his execution?  What did you think about the sky going dark at his crucifixion?  Or the earthquake at his death?  Do you think they are linked? 

The Gospels make mention that many women followers of Jesus were watching his crucifixion: Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Joses, the mother of Zebedee’s sons, Salome, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Jesus’ mother and her sister.  Any of these women could have been interrogated to confirm the death of Jesus, as well as the apostle John, who claims in his Gospel to have witnessed the crucifixion, even receiving instructions from Jesus to take care of his mother, Mary, while his rabbi hung on the cross.  Already, a large list of supposed witnesses could be located and examined to verify the Gospel accounts that Jesus did in fact die.  The greatest witness of them all though, would be the centurion who oversaw the crucifixion, and the soldier who stuck Jesus in the side with a spear (possibly the centurion).  The following is what John records of the death that he witnessed:

Now it was the day of Preparation, and the next day was to be a special Sabbath.  Because the Jews did not want the bodies left on the crosses during the Sabbath, they asked Pilate to have the legs broken and the bodies taken down.  The soldiers therefore came and broke the legs of the first man who had been crucified with Jesus, and then those of the other.  But when they came to Jesus and found that he was already dead, they did not break his legs.  Instead, one of the soldiers pierced Jesus’ side with a spear, bringing a sudden flow of blood and water.  (John 19:31-35)

soldier spear

                If Jesus was not sentenced to death by Pontius Pilate, surely Pontius would publically squelch that rumor, or Herod or the Sanhedrin.  If someone other than Jesus was nailed to the cross, the mob who demanded his crucifixion, the women disciples who stayed to his final breaths, his closest disciple, John, should have been able to confirm that Jesus did not die on a cross.  If anyone questioned if Jesus could have survived the crucifixion as a possible explanation for how his tomb was empty and people saw him alive post-mortem, the executioners would certainly be able to affirm if he was dead or not.  The man who thrust the spear into Jesus’ breathless body would be able to confirm if Jesus died on the cross.  The Gospels record that the centurion in charge of Jesus’ execution, after seeing how Jesus died, said, “Surely this man was the Son of God” (Mark 15:39).   The first century inquirer would seek the centurion for confirmation of Jesus’ death and would learn if he truly did believe Jesus was the Son of God based on the way he died.  If any of the Gospel accounts were false on how Jesus died, these witnesses would deny them.  Living in the 21st century we have no record that they ever did. 

1. “Historical Evidence for Crucifixion Darkness” retrieved from http://www.biblehistory.net/newsletter/crucifixion_darkness.htm on March 21st, 2013

2. Ibd.

3. Chan, Kei Thong.  Faith of Our Fathers: God in Ancient China. Shanghai, China, 345 Xianxialu, 2006. p. 318.

4. Ibd. p. 318.

Click here to order my book, Contradict – They Can’t All Be True.

Blog Announcement Letter

Dear Subscribers, and people who landed on this blog via Contradict Movement,

I am currently making a push to finish writing the book, Contradict – They Can’t All Be True.  Right now, I am sitting at about 140 single-spaced pages in Word.  I have about 2.5 chapters left to write.  Until, the first draft is finished, I won’t have any new posts to this blog.

Please pray that I finish the first draft soon and I can get the book published as soon as possible.

The good news is that the sticker is definitely generating conversations.  I hope the book will help further the depth of future Contradict kickstarted discussions.

Peace in Christ,
Andy Wrasman

The Harlem Shake – Why? What does it mean?

A student told me yesterday, “Do you want to see my ‘Harlem Shake’ video?”

“No, no, I don’t.  This is class.”
“But it’s so good!” was the student’s protest.

I was told that it’s the next big dance craze, similar to “Gangnum Style.”

What I chose to watch was a video that was on my Youtube homepage that was called, “Harlem’s Response to the Harlem Shakedown.”  They were not pleased.  They said that it was not the “Harlem Shake.”  I’m not familiar with the history of it, but it seems from everyone interviewed in Harlem, there is an official dance style referred to as the “Harlem Shake.”  Their response was that what they were seeing in the videos was just people dry humping each other or having sex with the air.  Oh great, I thought.  So that’s the big thing now, for a room of people to start mocking orgies?  The people from Harlem then demonstrated what they considered to be the “Harlem Shake.”  It reminded me of James Brown moves.  One of the old guys from Harlem said the real “Harlem Shake” came from 1916 and started to sing a song about Harlem.

I then watched a best of the “Harlem Shake” video and the videos were absurdly stupid in my opinion, and yes, it was a bunch of people for the most part humping the air.

So why is this so popular and what involvement, if any, should Christians have in partaking in making such videos?  I got duped into watching a men’s bible study video that actually was a bunch of men making a “Harlem Shake” video.  Why?  Why, label the video a “Men’s Bible Study Video” when it’s a “Harlem Shake” video?  Non-sense!

Anyways, here’s an article on this topic from Christianity Today.  You need to read it before making your own “Harlem Shake” video or sharing “Harlem Shake” videos on-line or “liking” “Harlem Shake” videos.  Take the time to do so please.

“The Problem of Christians Doing the Harlem Shake”
http://www.christianitytoday.com/women/2013/february/problem-with-christians-doing-harlem-shake.html?paging=off

Modern Day Worship Service Compared to 1 Corinthians 14

Check out this parody video of a modern day “contemporary” service:

What stood out to me in the video was the part that says, “And only one man has the answers.”  Many churches operate this way.  Only one person speaks to the congregation.  Only one person has the answers.  There isn’t time during the gathering to question that man, either in questioning for clarification or any confusion you have about what he is teaching or to question if what he is saying is in accord with God’s Word.  When he is finished speaking, there is no confirmation or affirmation of the message by those who heard it built into the service agenda/outline.

How does this common service outline of a “contemporary” service match what is found in 1 Corinthians 14?  How does a common “liturgical” or “traditional” service match what is found in 1 Corinthians 14?

I think we all need to read 1 Cor. 14 and pray over that chapter and the type of worship order that Paul describes. A lot of churches hold strong and firm to the part about not speaking in tongues unless there is an interpreter, and if there is speaking in tongues to not have more than 2-3 people do it, but completely skip the part about having more than one speaker (prophet) or the time for others to share revelations and other Scripture passages that affirm the message or correct it, as this video pointed out, in our modern day services, “One man alone has the answers.” It creates a be fed mentality and not a learn to feed yourself and feed others congregation.  We often times call our services fellowship, but is there much fellowship in them if everyone is facing forward and singing only what is told for them to sing, standing and sitting when told to do so, and communicating with one another only when told to shake hands and greet people, and only interacting briefly or none at all with the person who was up front teaching, while not knowing the individual needs of those around us, or being able to use our gifts of encouragement, prayer, teaching, generosity, prophecy, healing, and etc. unless we’re on the stage?