Christians Peddling Religious Inclusivism! The Proper Biblical Response.

There is a group page on Facebook entitled, Christians Tired of Being Misrepresented.  By this, they mean Christians like me!  They would say that I misrepresent Christianity by proclaiming the truth of Scripture, that salvation comes by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, and that faith comes through hearing the Gospel message of Jesus Christ. 

The following is an image that they posted to their page with this description:

We are Christians who have found an approach to God through the life and teachings of Jesus, the Christ – but recognize the faithfulness of other people who have other names for the way to God’s realm. We acknowledge that their ways are true for them, as our ways are true for us.”

Wrong Christianity
This is an image that Christians Tired of Being Misrepresented has posted to their Facebook page. To them, this image represents true Christianity. They can’t be further from the truth of the Bible!

When I shared this image and their quote to my Facebook page, Contradict – They Can’t All Be True, I only wrote the words, “Face Palm.”  That simple phrase indicated my frustration and utter dismay for their post.  I then received many comments in reply, from many thoughtful Christians quoting Scripture, or standing on the truth of Scripture.  Here are some of those excellent replies:

Brent Traylor gave a long list of verses that demonstrate the exclusive nature of the Christian message revealed in Scripture:

Acts 16:30-31, KJV …Sirs, what must I do to be saved? [31] And they said,Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.

John 14:6 Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”

Acts 4:12 [The apostle Peter said] Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved.”1

Corinthians 3:11 For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ.

1 Timothy 2:5 For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus,

John 3:18, 36 [18] Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son…. [36] Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God’s wrath remains on him.

John 6:66-68 Simon Peter answered him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life.”

John 8:23-24 But he continued, “You are from below; I am from above. You are of this world; I am not of this world. [24] I told you that you would die in your sins; if you do not believe that I am [the one I claim to be], you will indeed die in your sins.”

1 John 2:23 No one who denies the Son has the Father; whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also.

1 John 5:11-12 And this is the testimony: God has given us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. [12] He who has the Son has life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have life.

MIchael DiStefano pegged the origin of this nonsense:

Political correctness gone amok – I will NOT deny the blood Jesus shed for me!

Lisa Ann’s response was extreme, yet so spot on, in her description that I think I laughed out loud:

This is obscene! ! These people have never read The Holy Bible. There is only one God , the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

Lisa Koska said:

“We will never lump the Creator in with many lessor gods. The characteristics are completely different. The ways that are true for them lead to hell so just can’t sit back and be silent on that one. “I am Yahweh. That is my name. I will not give my glory to another, nor my praise to engraved images.” (Isaiah 42:8)

Josh Moore absolutely gets the total impossibility of religious pluralism.  Great comment, Josh:

Even Taking Christianity out of the equation, the statement they made is a logical fallacy.

Ernest Sire Sr. recognized the role Contradict Movement plays in response to these so called Christians:

This is perhaps the most vivid example of my understanding of why you started your ministry.

Yes, Ernest, yes it is! 

God bless you all for commenting and posting, and for standing on the truth of God’s Word.  Let’s always remain on the rock of our salvation! 

Check out www.contradictmovement.org.  Order my book there and get some Contradict stickers and tracts too.

My Radio Podcast Demo – Take the Survey Please!

I created a radio show demo, that has now been turned into a podcast demo.  Before I officially decide to embark on launching a podcast, I want some feedback on this demo.  Below you will see an embedded video of the first part of a two segment interview I conducted with Bill Foster, author of Meet the Skeptic.  The final product, of course, will be a podcast and not a vlog (video blog).  After listening to part one, please take a short survey for me at the following link:  https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1oqMt_YI_gggFtl-PYYSlOuu8xlJYO41EyS3-gKAK-ZE/viewform?usp=send_form

Religious Syncretism – German woman takes a stand against Chrislam!

A Muslim imam is scheduled to pray to Allah at a local Christian building of worship near you in an effort of peace between Muslims and Christians… what do you do? Do you attend? Do you allow Allah of the Qur’an to be invoked in the Christian sanctuary? One German lady said that if that happens, the building is no longer a church building; it is a mosque! She interrupted the prayer and shouted that “Jesus is Lord.” She proclaimed, “Here I stand I can do no other.”

 

Christians should not partake in religious syncretism, the blending of differing religious belief systems so as they are one.

Christians can certainly pray anywhere and at any time. I have visited a Muslim mosque before during Friday noon prayer, and as a guest I was well treated and given a tour of the mosque and given an explanation of what was to transpire when I showed up early. I was given a spot in the back to sit and I was not expected to pray, though I did pray to the Christian God (the Triune Lord) during the service. I just did not give any indication that I was praying, and I certainly didn’t pray in the same physical posturing associated with Islamic prayers, because I did not want to give any indication that I was praying to the same God as the Muslims.

When a building that is designated as a place of Christian worship, has prayers offered by a Muslim leader to Allah with the expectation that prayers offered by a Christian leader to the God of the Bible will follow, it is a clear form of syncretism. Chrislam is the term I have heard used for this type of blending.

I don’t understand why the prophet Muhammad would encourage Christians to pray in mosques in Medina, because Christians pray to a God that is not one person. We pray to a God that is three in person. In fact, I have had many Muslims tell me that I worship three gods, not one God (which I was told at UCI after speaking at the interfaith discussion you hosted).

Christians who are devote to the Bible’s revelation of God, must stand for Christ being Lord. He is not just a prophet. He is the second person of the Trinity revealed to us in human flesh. In Jesus, people have seen, heard, touched, and known God. He has revealed to us who God, the Father is, and he has sent to us the Holy Spirit (the third person in the Trinity). For Christians to pray openly along with Muslims, it gives the impression to both parties that we are praying to the same God, which is far from the truth.

In fact Israel, under the old covenant were always disciplined by God when they fell into religious syncretism.

John 14:6 is very clear. Jesus says, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”

For more examples of Chrislam, check out the following video, featuring George Bush, Brian Houston (Hillsong Pastor), and the Pope:

For more details on why all religions can’t be true, order a copy of my book, Contradict – They Can’t All Be True.

The Giver – Christian Themes and Response!

The Giver is a movie that has been completely off my radar.  I have no knowledge of the book, and I didn’t even really know it was a movie, besides that fact that I tuned out as soon as I heard it had Meryl Streep in it.  She has completely lost me as a viewer after her Oscar attempting stunts with that horrible movie she did with Tommy Lee Jones and her old, crazy lady performance in The Iron Lady, oh, and that other old, crazy lady performance in Osage County.  But then… a post on Facebook caught my attention.  It was a link to an article entitled, “Three Reasons Why The Giver is the best Christian Movie Since “Narnia”‘  The same day I read that article, Nolan J Matter sent me a review of a the article!  So yes, The Giver, has caught my attention, but I’m not sure yet if I will see it. 

the giver

I know Nolan from campus evangelism at Saddleback Community College.  He’s a student there and I met him when he approached me about my Contradict Evangelism table.  He initially thought I was an atheist and that he was going to have to share the Gospel with me.  To his surprise, I was a fellow follower of Christ and he began to meet me every week for 2-3 months to sit at the table with me.  I sense that Nolan will be a future, household name as a Christian known for proclaiming the Gospel and defending it vigorously.  In his World Religions class at Saddleback Community College, he essentially pulled a God is Not Dead and asked his atheist professor if he could present Christianity to the class.  Amazing young man and follower of Christ.  With his permission, I asked him if I could publish his movie review, because I liked the Christian connection he made and the built in apologetic for Christianity within his review.  Without further intro, here is Nolan J Matter’s The Giver review:

Last night I went to the cinema and sat through the production of The Giver. Now it is important to note that I had recently read an article entitled “Three Reasons Why The Giver is the Best Christian Movie Since ‘Narnia.’” After skimming the article, which I found quite interesting, I put it down…perhaps dismissing its relevance. But after watching the movie its relevance was all I could think of.

You see, during the last few years in my education, I have come across more than one professor who has outlined the atrocities committed by America; highlighting the bad, but some how forgetting the good. It seems that in the class room I hear daily of all the evil in the world; specifically all the evil America has committed. For my most recent assignment I had to read an article on the interment of Japanese Americans by the American Government. The article is titled “Then Came War” by Yuri Kochiyama, if you are interested in researching it. This article like many others from my classes seems to be outlining all the terrible things that America has done. The professors only want to discuss these types of articles; the type that talk about society’s mistakes. The premise of The Giver is that society has done away with evil; by creating a neutral society there is no evil—but there is also no good. In order to make life meaningful the Giver has to find a way to go against the society and bring back the memories of the past. The Elders in The Giver are against bringing back any past memories because they do not want evil and pain to be a part of their society.

At one point in the article “Then Came War” the author talks about an experience she had while she was on her way to the internment camp. Her train was stopped at the station when an older gentleman asked her to write letters to him. This act of kindness form a passerby, someone who she thinks could have viewed her as less than American, speaks volumes to the great good that humans can have—and give.

Of course there is great evil in the world, but would we as a society trade in love to get rid of hate? To be neutral so everyone can be normal? The Giver recognizes society’s flaws, he sees the evil of the world—he is the only one who sees it, and yet he is willing to unleash it on society? Why? Because he perceives the good—greater than any evil.

Most people have looked at America and said you have always been putting people behind walls, but shouldn’t our mindset be like the Giver and his rationale for wanting to eradicate the neutral society. Yes America has put people behind walls but America has also set people free. I will let you decide what has a greeter impact.

We cannot highlight the bad and leave out the good! We as Christian are called to share the good news not the bad news. Yes I understand that there is bad news, but if we are standing on a street corner condemneding people we are letting the evil have power over the good—are job is not to condemn, but to redeem. We as Christians need to emphasis the fact that all the evil in the world will be eradicated by the strongest good—Jesus Christ.

[End of Nolan’s review]

There will come an end to evil for all of those that are found in Christ Jesus.  Amen, Nolan. 

Having not read the book or seen the movie, I assume this man is either The Giver or one of the elders.
Having not read the book or seen the movie, I assume this man is either The Giver or one of the elders.